Heat in Operations: A Stress Test for Inspection Management

Heat doesn't immediately make everything dangerous; it only reduces your safety margin. Here's why swab tests, cleaning, and the cold chain need closer scrutiny in summer.
Heat in Operations: A Stress Test for Inspection Management
Food Safety
Food Hygiene
HACCP
Risk Management
Microbiology

36 degrees Celsius. And it's getting even hotter.

For humans, this is strenuous. For microorganisms, it can be favorable.

In food processing facilities, heat doesn't automatically mean a microbiological problem. But it changes the safety margin. What was stable for a long time under normal conditions can be thrown off balance with warmth and moisture.

Areas where several factors converge are particularly critical: moisture, nutrient residues, hard-to-clean surfaces, seals, drains, conveyor belts, filling areas, hoses, rollers, condensate, and longer dwell times.

Biofilms

Biofilms form where microorganisms can adhere to surfaces and where sufficient time, moisture, and nutrients are available. Heat can promote this process. A study on Salmonella on food contact surfaces, published in 2025, showed: On stainless steel, silicone, and nylon, eight investigated Salmonella serotypes formed significantly higher cell counts at 37 °C after 24 hours than at 10 °C. Approximately 7 log CFU/cm² at 37 °C were reported, compared to approximately 5 log CFU/cm² at 10 °C. At the same time, material and serotype also influenced biofilm formation (Counihan et al. 2025).

Current data also show that temperature influences biofilm formation and cell behavior in Listeria monocytogenes. In a study on stainless steel surfaces in an ice cream processing environment, biofilm formation rates and viable cell counts were lower at 5 °C than at 15 °C and 25 °C. Concurrently, bacterial motility increased with rising temperature (Li et al. 2025).

A monthly swab test might not be enough

A monthly swab test may be adequate for stable processes. However, during heatwaves, it should be checked whether this frequency still matches the actual risk.

Because four weeks is a long time if, during this period, cold rooms are overloaded, doors remain open longer, surfaces dry more slowly, condensation occurs, or product residues become microbiologically active more quickly.

A single hygiene finding always shows only a snapshot. The trend is crucial: Are values slowly deteriorating? Are there recurring anomalies in the same places? Do findings occur more frequently after cleaning? Are there hotspots that were unremarkable during normal operation?

Climate change is also a monitoring management issue

The World Health Organization explicitly identifies climate change as a factor influencing food safety. Higher air and water temperatures, extreme weather, and altered precipitation patterns can increase risks from existing and new foodborne illnesses (WHO 2019).

For businesses, this means: Heatwaves should not only be considered as an occupational safety or refrigeration technology issue. They also belong in microbiological risk assessment, cleaning evaluation, environmental monitoring, and cold chain verification.

Particularly important: Truly verify the cold chain

Temperature specifications on paper are not enough. During heatwaves, quality assurance should check what is actually happening:

Are products pre-cooled? How long do goods remain in front of cold rooms, lines, or ramps? How often and for how long are doors opened? Are cold rooms fully utilized? Are there temperature spikes during internal transport? How warm do critical products get in the worst-case scenario?

Loggers help enormously here (see e.g. Hyprint). Not just in the cold room, but also close to the product: in containers, transport containers, intermediate storage areas, at ramps, or in critical process sections.

It's important not to just look at final temperatures. Short-term deviations and warming can accumulate. Depending on the product, initial microbial load, pH value, water activity, packaging, and shelf-life concept, the best-before date (MHD) for example, changes.

What Quality Assurance Should Do Now

1. Re-evaluate risk zones Check damp areas, seals, drains, fillers, cutting areas, conveyor systems, rollers, hoses, cold storage doors, ramps, and hard-to-reach niches.

2. Temporarily intensify environmental monitoring Don't increase sampling everywhere, but rather risk-based: where moisture, heat, product contact, high frequency, or unusual previous findings converge.

3. Supplement contact plates with other methodsContact plates only cover suitable, accessible surfaces. For niches, crevices, seals, and hard-to-reach areas, swabs are often more effective. Additionally, rapid tests for organic residues can provide indications of cleaning performance.

4. Verify cleaning and disinfectionCheck concentration, contact time, mechanics, temperature, wetting, rinsing, and drying. During heatwaves, dried-on residues, biofilm remnants, and shortened actual contact times are particularly critical.

5. Monitor the cold chain with loggers Record not only ambient temperatures but also product-adjacent temperatures. Particularly relevant: goods receipt, intermediate storage, preparation, production, packaging, shipping dock, and vehicle.

6. Set warning limits Don't only react when limit values are exceeded. Internal warning limits are useful for temperature deviations, rising microbiological trends, repeated hygiene findings, or visible condensate.

7. Critically consider shelf life If products are repeatedly exposed to higher temperatures than assumed in the shelf-life assessment, it should be assessed whether the previous assumption remains robust.

8. Involve engineering Quality assurance cannot audit away an overloaded refrigeration system. Refrigeration system, air circulation, door closure, seals, defrost cycles, heat loads, and condensate management must also be scrutinized.

9. Briefly raise employee awareness Close doors. Don't leave goods standing unnecessarily. Report moisture. Remove product residues immediately. Take unusual odors, greasy films, or condensate seriously. Small behavioral changes often make a big difference during heatwaves.

10. Evaluate after the heatwave Jointly analyze temperature data, hygiene findings, deviations, complaints, and follow-up cleaning. This can indicate whether a fixed summer inspection program is advisable.

Conclusion

Heat is no reason for panic.

But a good reason to take a closer look.

Those who more closely monitor surfaces, cleaning success, and the cold chain during periods of heat not only protect product safety. They also protect shelf life, complaint rates, process stability, and auditability.

Summer is not an exceptional situation. Summer is a stress test for inspection management.

Sources

Counihan, K. L., Tilman, S., Uknalis, J., Mukhopadhyay, S., Niemira, B. A., & Bermudez-Aguirre, D. (2025): Attachment and Biofilm Formation of Eight Different Salmonella Serotypes on Three Food-Contact Surfaces at Different Temperatures. Microorganisms 13(7), 1446. DOI:10.3390/microorganisms13071446.

Li, Z., Wang, J., Gao, Y., Zhang, H., Liu, Y., Xia, X., Li, W., Yan, L., & Dong, Q. (2025): Impact of temperature fluctuation on biofilm formation and removal of different Listeria monocytogenes strains in ice cream processing environments. Food Research International. Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0963996925017545

World Health Organization (2019): Food safety, climate change and the role of WHO. World Health Organization, Geneva. Available at: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/food-safety-climate-change-and-the-role-of-who

 

Share this article:

Publications & Technical Papers

Practical experience — passed on in specialist literature, training courses and contributions on food safety.

Dr. Andrea Dreusch

Director Food Safety Senior Experts, Microbiologist & Food Safety Expert

With decades of experience in audits, quality management and crisis situations, she combines scientific principles with operational practice. Her publications make complex topics such as HACCP, food safety culture and risk analysis understandable and directly applicable. For companies that not only pass certifications, but also want to sustainably improve their systems.

Lebensmittelsicherheitskultur
Grundlagen einer Lebensmittelsicherheitskultur
Hygiene and microbiology
Allergens — compact and understandable

Dr. Andrea Dreusch · Director of Food Safety Senior Experts

KALS 2026 — Karlsruhe Food Symposium

The industry event for decision makers in quality management, audits and food safety.

For over X years, the Karlsruhe Food Symposium has been connecting managers from QM, audit and production. Technical presentations, practical cases and exchange on equal terms.

Learn more